Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 875 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Core i7-2600K - 51 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $70.0 vs $498.95
- Up to 85% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-4765T - $1.49 vs $9.78 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.78/FPS
15.235173824130879%
Price, $
$498.95
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349454 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
47
92.15686274509804%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349452 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
73.24561403508771%
Multi-Core
2320
79.69769838543456%
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |