Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700 is 759 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4765T - 166 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $150.0 vs $498.95
- Up to 71% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4765T - $0.9 vs $3.12 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
160
96.3855421686747%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
28.846153846153843%
Price, $
$498.95
30%
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348542 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
912
70.53364269141531%
Multi-Core
2911
70.31400966183575%
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |