Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3537 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-4800MQ - 233 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 32 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Single-Core
1031
37.765567765567766%
Multi-Core
3046
17.689761310180614%
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 47 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
