Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 4944 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 25 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 146% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-640LM - 553 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Ryzen 5 7500F
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
377
13.739067055393587%
Multi-Core
681
5.403046651856553%
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
