Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2645 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $150.0 vs $522.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-13900K - $3.06 vs $5.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 108% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-6700 - 102 vs 49 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
49
48.03921568627451%
Value, $/FPS
$3.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348670 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.13/FPS
59.64912280701755%
Price, $
$522.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1293
43.47679892400807%
Multi-Core
4140
20.54794520547945%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |