Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700K is 992 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 2700 - 59 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $180.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 7 2700 - $3.05 vs $3.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280641 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |