Buy on Amazon
$99.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 664 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $99.9 vs $400.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-7900X - $0.84 vs $3.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6700T - 122 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
97.54098360655738%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348841 minutes ago
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.28/FPS
25.609756097560975%
Price, $
$400
24%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-7900X X-Series Processor 10 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for $400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
83.19268635724332%
Multi-Core
3566
40.61040883726227%
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
