Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $108.0 vs $147.99
- Up to 5% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-13100 - $1.96 vs $2.06 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 31% better in Starfield than Core i7-6800K - 72 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
55
76.38888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349338 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.06/FPS
95.14563106796116%
Price, $
$147.99
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
54.32756324900133%
Multi-Core
5661
77.15687610740083%
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |