Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 2065 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i5-12600 - $145.0 vs $239.99
- Up to 33% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-12600 - $0.88 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-6900K - 183 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
165
90.1639344262295%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
67.17557251908397%
Price, $
$239.99
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
52.80472374525517%
Multi-Core
7118
73.2229194527312%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |