Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 217 days older than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Core i5-7500T - 56 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $69.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-6900K - $1.28 vs $2.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.59/FPS
49.42084942084942%
Price, $
$145
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350013 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
54
96.42857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350013 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1110
88.65814696485623%
Multi-Core
3076
43.21438606350098%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |