Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1969 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Starfield than Core i7-2600K - 56 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $70.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-6900K - $1.49 vs $2.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.59/FPS
57.528957528957534%
Price, $
$145
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350012 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
47
83.92857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350010 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
53.35463258785943%
Multi-Core
2320
32.59342511941556%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |