Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6950X is 822 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 172 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $651.07 vs $1075.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $3.79 vs $6.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 32 vs 20 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$651.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351574 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
171
99.4186046511628%
Value, $/FPS
$6.29/FPS
60.254372019077906%
Price, $
$1075
60%
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351574 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Single-Core
1263
97.52895752895753%
Multi-Core
8338
98.70960104178998%
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |