Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4859 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 45 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-820QM - 348 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Single-Core
382
12.302737520128824%
Multi-Core
1009
4.621444602207667%
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
