Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 4866 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - $48.0 vs $339.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-13700 - $0.32 vs $1.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 36% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-860 - 206 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
151
73.30097087378641%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362291 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
19.393939393939398%
Price, $
$339.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $339.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362291 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |