Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-870 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $100.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900F - $0.6 vs $1.18 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-870 - 204 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-870 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
168
82.35294117647058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348538 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
50.847457627118644%
Price, $
$240
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348539 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-870 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |