Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 2073 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than Core i5-3450S - 60 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - $95.0 vs $869.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-8700 - $2.07 vs $14.5 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.5/FPS
14.275862068965516%
Price, $
$869.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $869.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349822 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
46
76.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349821 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
38.59881031064111%
Multi-Core
1681
28.467400508044033%
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450S |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |