Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $90.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.33 vs $3.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-920 - 293 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 32 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
273
93.1740614334471%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349583 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
293
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.67/FPS
8.99182561307902%
Price, $
$1075
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
32.85827395091053%
Multi-Core
1434
17.19836891340849%
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |