Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 4780 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 262% better in Diablo IV than Core i7-940XM - 326 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-940XM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Ryzen 5 7500F
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940XM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Single-Core
416
15.160349854227405%
Multi-Core
1132
8.981275785464932%
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
