Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 4216 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 44% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-940XM - 128 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-940XM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940XM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Single-Core
416
16.38440330838913%
Multi-Core
1132
8.149748020158388%
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
