Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-960 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3845 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-960.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-960 - 176 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-960 - $112.53 vs $299.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-960 - $0.64 vs $1.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-960 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-960 - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
FPS
168
95.45454545454545%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
35.95505617977528%
Price, $
$299
37%
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360611 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360612 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Single-Core
491
34.14464534075105%
Multi-Core
1663
28.916710137367414%
Intel Core i7-960 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 20th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |