Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 15% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 7 2700X - 171 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $210.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 38% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-9700F - $1.41 vs $2.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
61.8421052631579%
Price, $
$389.88
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348515 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
149
87.13450292397661%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1245
80.37443511943188%
Multi-Core
6113
97.71419437340153%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |