Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 373 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-10100 - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $99.03 vs $389.88
- Up to 74% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-9700F - $0.49 vs $1.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.92/FPS
25.520833333333332%
Price, $
$389.88
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348904 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
99.01477832512316%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1426
92.0593931568754%
Multi-Core
4215
67.37531969309462%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |