Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 373 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-9700F - 125 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $133.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-9700F - $1.06 vs $3.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
123
98.4%
Value, $/FPS
$3.17/FPS
33.43848580441641%
Price, $
$389.88
34%
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348855 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $133 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348855 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1549
91.87425860023724%
Multi-Core
6256
91.74365742777533%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |