Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1057 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6800K - 136 vs 134 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $108.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 72% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-9700F - $0.81 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
28.222996515679444%
Price, $
$389.88
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348969 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
134
98.52941176470588%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
79.0187217559716%
Multi-Core
5661
90.48913043478261%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |