Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 183 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 5 2600 - 196 vs 165 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $155.0 vs $279.13
- Up to 34% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-9700K - $0.94 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 12 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
66.19718309859155%
Price, $
$279.13
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $279.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349032 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
165
84.18367346938776%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349032 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
68.98203592814372%
Multi-Core
4841
68.2888982931302%
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |