Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 879 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700K - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $240.0 vs $279.13
- Up to 20% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700K - $1.98 vs $2.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $279.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280314 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |