Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Core i9-10885H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1376 days newer than Core i9-10885H.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 13% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10885H - 191 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10885H - 28 vs 16 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Single-Core
1533
55.24324324324324%
Multi-Core
6497
37.48557581352412%
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 20 |
| 16 | Threads | 28 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
