Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1430 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6850K - 193 vs 184 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6850K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6850K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $120.0 vs $299.98
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900 - $0.65 vs $1.55 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
41.935483870967744%
Price, $
$299.98
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348676 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
184
95.33678756476684%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348677 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1268
74.4131455399061%
Multi-Core
5821
69.12480703004394%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |