Buy on Amazon
$244.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $244.77 vs $406.45
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $1.27 vs $2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900F - 194 vs 193 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
99.48453608247422%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
60.476190476190474%
Price, $
$406.45
60%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-core, 16-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $406.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
95.33560864618885%
Multi-Core
8426
99.3514915693904%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
