Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 7 2700X - 63 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $210.0 vs $283.35
- Up to 1% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900KF - $4.47 vs $4.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.5/FPS
99.33333333333333%
Price, $
$283.35
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
47
74.60317460317461%
Value, $/FPS
$4.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1245
70.6182643221781%
Multi-Core
6113
66.7795499235307%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |