Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 195 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $283.35 vs $1075.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $1.45 vs $5.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$283.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348500 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
183
93.84615384615384%
Value, $/FPS
$5.87/FPS
24.701873935264054%
Price, $
$1075
26%
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348500 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Single-Core
1263
71.6392512762337%
Multi-Core
8338
91.08586410312431%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |