Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 88 days older than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $283.35 vs $286.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10850K - $2.51 vs $2.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$283.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353922 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
99.2094861660079%
Price, $
$286
99%
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Single-Core
1740
98.69540555870675%
Multi-Core
9096
99.36639720340834%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |