Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 32 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Athlon 3000G - 136 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $63.83 vs $827.21
- Up to 92% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10920X - $0.51 vs $6.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.08/FPS
8.388157894736842%
Price, $
$827.21
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $827.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349757 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
125
91.91176470588235%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
57.134328358208954%
Multi-Core
1975
17.402414309630803%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Athlon |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |