Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 548 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 7 2700 - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $185.0 vs $827.21
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10920X - $1.13 vs $4.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.84/FPS
23.347107438016526%
Price, $
$827.21
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $827.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
163
95.32163742690058%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
66.50746268656717%
Multi-Core
5489
48.36549475724733%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |