Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1019 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Core i5-7400T - 207 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $63.5 vs $827.21
- Up to 91% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-10920X - $0.36 vs $4.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $827.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349766 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
178
85.99033816425121%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349766 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
60.71641791044776%
Multi-Core
2806
24.724645343202045%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |