Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 548 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700X - 190 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $210.0 vs $820.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10940X - $1.15 vs $4.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 105 vs 165 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.32/FPS
26.620370370370367%
Price, $
$820
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $820 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
183
96.3157894736842%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1245
79.70550576184378%
Multi-Core
6113
56.76478781688179%
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |