Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 514 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 28 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Core i9-10940X - 70 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $150.0 vs $820.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10940X - $2.14 vs $13.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
61
87.14285714285714%
Value, $/FPS
$13.44/FPS
15.92261904761905%
Price, $
$820
18%
Buy for $820 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349939 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
70
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349938 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |