Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4690 - 193 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $52.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900 - $0.31 vs $1.4 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
22.142857142857146%
Price, $
$270
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361952 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
169
87.56476683937824%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361953 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
55.91549295774648%
Multi-Core
3303
37.46597096188748%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |