Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 47% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-2600K - 217 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $70.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-11900 - $0.47 vs $1.24 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
37.903225806451616%
Price, $
$270
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349226 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
148
68.20276497695853%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
31.36150234741784%
Multi-Core
2320
26.31578947368421%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |