Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-4130 - 560 vs 520 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $43.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-11900F - $0.08 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
18.6046511627907%
Price, $
$240
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361990 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
520
92.85714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361991 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
45.831414094887144%
Multi-Core
1960
21.371715189183295%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |