Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-7100 - 657 vs 539 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $70.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900F - $0.13 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
35.13513513513514%
Price, $
$240
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361192 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
539
82.03957382039574%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
57.438968217411336%
Multi-Core
2440
26.605604623269002%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |