Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3450S - 194 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $95.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - $0.62 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362003 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
154
79.38144329896907%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362002 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
26.90004606172271%
Multi-Core
1681
18.329516955620978%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-3450S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |