Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 29% better in Minecraft than Core i5-3470 - 799 vs 618 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $69.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-11900F - $0.11 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
799
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
36.66666666666667%
Price, $
$240
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361145 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
618
77.34668335419273%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
28.65039152464302%
Multi-Core
1840
20.063242830661867%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |