Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7500 - 164 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $89.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-11900F - $0.56 vs $1.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
38.35616438356165%
Price, $
$240
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350365 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
96.34146341463415%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1270
58.4983878397052%
Multi-Core
3478
37.92389052447934%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-7500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |