Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2085 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-6700 - 657 vs 544 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $150.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900F - $0.28 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
75.67567567567568%
Price, $
$240
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350198 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
544
82.80060882800609%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1293
59.557807461999076%
Multi-Core
4140
45.14229636898921%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |