Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-8700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1170 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-8700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-8700 - 146 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - $240.0 vs $869.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-8700 - $1.64 vs $6.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350950 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
133
91.0958904109589%
Value, $/FPS
$6.54/FPS
25.076452599388375%
Price, $
$869.99
27%
Buy for $869.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1513
69.69138645785353%
Multi-Core
5905
64.38774397557519%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |