Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-960 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4165 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-960.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-960 - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-960 - $240.0 vs $299.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-960 - $1.46 vs $2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-960 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-960 - 16 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350380 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
FPS
149
90.85365853658537%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
72.636815920398%
Price, $
$299
80%
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350379 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Single-Core
491
22.616305849838785%
Multi-Core
1663
18.133246101842765%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-960 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 20th, 2009 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |