Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3586 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2405S - 197 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $46.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900KF - $0.3 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
24.59016393442623%
Price, $
$240
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362005 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
153
77.66497461928934%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362005 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
23.090202848511005%
Multi-Core
1429
14.113580246913578%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |