Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-920 - 290 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $90.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-11900KF - $0.39 vs $0.83 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
290
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
46.98795180722892%
Price, $
$240
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361158 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
233
80.3448275862069%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
17.911091929218816%
Multi-Core
1434
14.162962962962963%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |