Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $458.0 vs $593.77
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13600KF - $3.01 vs $3.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-12900 - 158 vs 152 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
152
96.20253164556962%
Value, $/FPS
$3.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$458
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351073 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.76/FPS
80.0531914893617%
Price, $
$593.77
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351073 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
2473
90.02548234437569%
Multi-Core
13044
84.61887771650989%
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |